Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:13:23 +0200 | From | Sakari Ailus <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] v4l: doc: Clarify v4l2_mbus_fmt height definition |
| |
Hi Kieran,
Thanks for the update.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 05:55:24PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote: > The v4l2_mbus_fmt width and height corresponds directly with the > v4l2_pix_format definitions, yet the differences in documentation make > it ambiguous what to do in the event of field heights. > > Clarify this using the same text as is provided for the v4l2_pix_format > which is explicit on the matter, and by matching the terminology of > 'image height' rather than the misleading 'frame height'. > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
-- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi
| |