lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Feedback on 4.9 performance after PTI fixes
From
Date
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 19:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> You're totally right, I discovered during my later developments that
> indeed PCID is not exposed there. So we take the hit of a full TLB
> flush twice per syscall.

So I really think it might make sense to redo the tests with PCID, because the
assumptions you're basing your patch series on might actually not hold.

Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:18    [W:0.521 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site