lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 07/11] arm64: Add skeleton to harden the branch predictor against aliasing attacks
Hi Will, Marc,

On 05/01/18 13:12, Will Deacon wrote:
> Aliasing attacks against CPU branch predictors can allow an attacker to
> redirect speculative control flow on some CPUs and potentially divulge
> information from one context to another.
>
> This patch adds initial skeleton code behind a new Kconfig option to
> enable implementation-specific mitigations against these attacks for
> CPUs that are affected.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
> index 6f7bdb89817f..6dd83d75b82a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,43 @@ static inline bool arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0(void)

> +static inline struct bp_hardening_data *arm64_get_bp_hardening_data(void)
> +{
> + return this_cpu_ptr(&bp_hardening_data);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm64_apply_bp_hardening(void)
> +{
> + struct bp_hardening_data *d;
> +
> + if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR))
> + return;
> +
> + d = arm64_get_bp_hardening_data();
> + if (d->fn)
> + d->fn();
> +}

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 22168cd0dde7..5203b6040cb6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static void __do_user_fault(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
> lsb = PAGE_SHIFT;
> si.si_addr_lsb = lsb;
>
> + arm64_apply_bp_hardening();

Due to the this_cpu_ptr() call:

| BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: print_my_pa/2093
| caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x24
| CPU: 0 PID: 2093 Comm: print_my_pa Tainted: G W
4.15.0-rc3-00044-g7f0aaec94f27-dirty #8950
| Call trace:
| dump_backtrace+0x0/0x164
| show_stack+0x14/0x1c
| dump_stack+0xa4/0xdc
| check_preemption_disabled+0xfc/0x100
| debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x24
| __do_user_fault+0xcc/0x180
| do_page_fault+0x14c/0x364
| do_translation_fault+0x40/0x48
| do_mem_abort+0x40/0xb8
| el0_da+0x20/0x24

Make it a TIF flag?

(Seen with arm64's kpti-base tag and this series)


> force_sig_info(sig, &si, tsk);
> }


Thanks,

James

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:17    [W:1.560 / U:1.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site