lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCHv6 1/1] ima: re-introduce own integrity cache lock
From
Date
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 17:40 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> [might as well cc linux-xfs]
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:22:37AM +0200, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could I ask FS maintainers to test IMA with this patch additionally
> > and provide ack/tested.
> > We tested but may be you have and some special testing.
>
> Super-late to this party, but unless xfstests has automated tests to
> set up IMA on top of an existing filesystem then I most likely have no
> idea /how/ to test IMA. I did a quick grep of xfstests git and I don't
> see anything IMA-related.

Back in June I posted a simple xfstests IMA-appraisal test (https://ma
rc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149703820814885&w=4).

Mimi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-03 03:53    [W:0.033 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site