Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:34:43 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 tip/master 1/3] retpoline: Introduce start/end markers of indirect thunk |
| |
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:06:10 +0000 "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 21:01 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > > +#define X86_INDIRECT_THUNK(reg) \ > > + *(.text.__x86.indirect_thunk.##reg) > > Note that we don't actually care about those being in their own > section, named after the register. That was just a hangover from the > initial GCC COMDAT implementation. > > If it makes your life easier just to put them all in a single section, > go ahead.
Got it. I just concerned that gcc was using this section. I'll make it ".text.__x86.indirect_thunk" to consolidate.
Thanks!
-- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
| |