Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | [PATCH 01/27] perf test bpf: Improve message about expected samples | Date | Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:28:18 -0300 |
| |
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
When failing on one of the BPF tests we were just stating:
BPF filter result incorrect
Add some more info to help figuring out the problem:
BPF filter result incorrect, expected 56, got 0 samples
This came out while investigating this failure, first seen after updating the kernel to the 4.15.0-rc6 tag:
[root@jouet ~]# perf test bpf 39: BPF filter : 39.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED! 39.2: BPF pinning : Skip 39.3: BPF prologue generation: Skip 39.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip [root@jouet ~]#
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-403npu7daupv6b2bmxliv5pk@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> --- tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c index c433dd30975a..057c6b8fdb53 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int do_test(struct bpf_object *obj, int (*func)(void), } if (count != expect) { - pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect\n"); + pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect, expected %d, got %d samples\n", expect, count); goto out_delete_evlist; } -- 2.14.3
| |