lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 01/27] perf test bpf: Improve message about expected samples
Date
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

When failing on one of the BPF tests we were just stating:

BPF filter result incorrect

Add some more info to help figuring out the problem:

BPF filter result incorrect, expected 56, got 0 samples

This came out while investigating this failure, first seen after
updating the kernel to the 4.15.0-rc6 tag:

[root@jouet ~]# perf test bpf
39: BPF filter :
39.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED!
39.2: BPF pinning : Skip
39.3: BPF prologue generation: Skip
39.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip
[root@jouet ~]#

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-403npu7daupv6b2bmxliv5pk@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index c433dd30975a..057c6b8fdb53 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int do_test(struct bpf_object *obj, int (*func)(void),
}

if (count != expect) {
- pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect\n");
+ pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect, expected %d, got %d samples\n", expect, count);
goto out_delete_evlist;
}

--
2.14.3
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:22    [W:0.370 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site