Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Sep 2017 21:14:52 -0700 | From | Darren Hart <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] Add driver to force WMI Thunderbolt controller power status |
| |
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 03:15:10PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@dell.com wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 3:07 AM > > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com> > > Cc: dvhart@infradead.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; platform-driver- > > x86@vger.kernel.org; Richard Hughes <hughsient@gmail.com>; Yehezkel Bernat > > <yehezkelshb@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add driver to force WMI Thunderbolt controller power > > status > > > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 01:47:22PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > > > > I have a small comment which you might want to consider. > > > > > +static int intel_wmi_thunderbolt_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev) > > > +{ > > > + return sysfs_create_group(&wdev->dev.kobj, &tbt_attribute_group); > > > +} > > > + > > > +static int intel_wmi_thunderbolt_remove(struct wmi_device *wdev) > > > +{ > > > + sysfs_remove_group(&wdev->dev.kobj, &tbt_attribute_group); > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > > In order to notify userspace about this, what if you send KOBJ_CHANGE > > for the wdev when you add/remove this attribute? > > Sure, makes sense to me. I'll send a follow up patch.
Hrm, what am I missing.... the reason I recommended Mario add the attribute group was so this would be automatically taken care of prior to the KOBJ_ADD event, per the device documentation:
driver-model/device.txt
-- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center
| |