lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for GCC 4.4

* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:53:09PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> > > Fixes: f5caf621ee35 ("x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for Clang")
> > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> >
> > Side note: it's not like I personally need the credit, but in general
> > I really want people to pick up on who debugged the code and pointed
> > to the solution. That's often more of the work than the fix itself.
> >
> > The kernel test robot report looked to be ignored as a "gcc-4.4 is too
> > old to worry about" thing. People who then step up and analyze the
> > problem are rare as it is. They need to be credited in the commit
> > logs.
> >
> > We don't have any fixed format for that, but it's pretty free-form. So
> > we have tags like
> >
> > Root-caused-by:
> > Diagnosed-by:
> > Analyzed-by:
> > Debugged-by:
> > Bisected-by:
> > Fix-suggested-by:
> >
> > etc for giving credit to people who figured out some part of a bug
> > (and, having grepped for this, we also a _shitload_ of miss-spellings
> > of various things ;)
>
> Indeed, credit is important and I try to give it where it's due. Sorry
> for the snub! I anoint you with:
>
> Debugged-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When applying the fix I went with:

Diagnosed-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Because I think 'diagnosing' a bug is a higher category, which implies debugging.

( Sometimes we refer to 'debugging a bug' as the reporter adding printks on
request and printing out key state that helps understand the bug. It does not
necessarily imply root-causing the bug. )

Also note that I added a "Reported-and-Bisected-by:" tag for the ktest robot, to
further credit the fact that in addition to reporting a kernel crash, a specific
commit was bisected to as well.

I'll wait for another round of ktest robot testing to make sure the crash is
indeed fixed.

Thanks,

Ingo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-29 10:02    [W:0.068 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site