Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add missing types to checkpatch.pl --list-types | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Sat, 02 Sep 2017 15:58:05 -0700 |
| |
On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 23:03 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Oh, btw, is there any purpose in listing a number in front of each > type?
Not really. I did that because I wanted a header and because I had no idea how many of those types existed and I was too lazy to count.
> It makes it look like one can pass that number instead of the > type name, however it doesn't work, and I don't think it should as the > numbering isn't stable and could change with any update of the script.
True.
> Can't we simplify the output and simply print the list of type names?
<shrug> If you want.
| |