| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/40] tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support | From | Tom Zanussi <> | Date | Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:44:28 -0500 |
| |
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:31 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:57:12 -0500 > Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is V2 of the inter-event tracing patchset. > > > > Hi Tom, > > I was wondering if you had a v3 ready? I would like to get it into the > next merge window, but I would also like it to be in linux-next early, > which means we need the next version rather soon (hopefully that will > be the last version). >
Yeah, it's almost ready. At this point, I've addressed all the comments except for:
- PATCH v2 25/40] tracing: Add support for dynamic tracepoints
which I need to do a little bit of research on to figure out what exactly I need to do there.
I was also kind of looking for a couple patches from you to fold in which you had mentioned you were going to send for:
- [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types_lock are taken - [PATCH v2 40/40] tracing: Add trace_event_buffer_reserve() variant that allows recursion
I've been using the trace_recursive_lock() patch you posted in place of the latter and it's working fine. :-)
Tom
> -- Steve
|