lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New ML for TPM and IMA
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:25:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:18 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the
> > July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users,
> > such as patchwork.
> >
> > We decided to create a new mailing list linux-integrit@vger.kernel.org
> > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies.
> > Otherwise, the maintainer hierarchy etc. will stay the same.
> >
> > It is all documented here:
> >
> > http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity
> >
> > From now on use this list for patches and discussion instead of the
> > legacy list.
>
> And is there to be an update to the MAINTAINERS file entries?
>
> Extended Verification Module (EVM)
> L: linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> L: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
>
> INTEGRITY MEASUREMENT ARCHITECTURE (IMA)
> L: linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> L: linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> L: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
>
> TPM DEVICE DRIVER
> L: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net (moderated for non-subscribers)
>
> TPM IBM_VTPM DEVICE DRIVER
> L: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net (moderated for non-subscribers)

Yes, I'll get onto it. BTW, do we need two entries for TPM in the
MAINTAINERS file or can I merge those?

/Jarkko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-15 19:36    [W:1.628 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site