lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: fix null-pointer dereference in arm_smmu_add_device
Hi Artem,

Thanks for the patch.

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:58:01AM +0200, Artem Savkov wrote:
> Commit c54451a "iommu/arm-smmu: Fix the error path in arm_smmu_add_device"
> removed fwspec assignment in legacy_binding path as redundant which is
> wrong. It needs to be updated after fwspec initialisation in
> arm_smmu_register_legacy_master() as it is dereferenced later. Without
> this there is a NULL-pointer dereference panic during boot on some hosts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index b97188a..95f1c86 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1519,6 +1519,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>
> if (using_legacy_binding) {
> ret = arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(dev, &smmu);
> + fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
> if (ret)
> goto out_free;
> } else if (fwspec && fwspec->ops == &arm_smmu_ops) {

Damn, you're completely right! Robin and I bashed our heads against this for
a while and couldn't remember why the code was structured like it was, but
that explains it. Can you add a comment saying that
arm_smmu_register_legacy_master will allocate an fwspec if its initially NULL,
please?

Cheers,

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-08 11:26    [W:0.029 / U:1.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site