Messages in this thread | | | From | Kees Cook <> | Date | Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:35:14 -0700 | Subject | Re: tip -ENOBOOT - bisected to locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Implement fast refcount overflow protection |
| |
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 11:41 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> Can you also test with 14afee4b6092 ("net: convert sock.sk_wmem_alloc >> from atomic_t to refcount_t") reverted (instead of ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT >> disabled)? > > Nogo.
Thanks for checking!
> [ 44.901930] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 0 at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:374 netlink_sock_destruct+0x82/0xa0
This is so odd if 14afee4b6092 is reverted. What is line 374 for you in net/netlink/af_netlink.c?
-Kees
-- Kees Cook Pixel Security
| |