Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: [v5 2/4] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer | From | Aleksa Sarai <> | Date | Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:20:18 +1000 |
| |
On 08/15/2017 10:15 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > Generally, oom_score_adj should have a meaning only on a cgroup level, > so extending it to the system level doesn't sound as a good idea.
But wasn't the original purpose of oom_score (and oom_score_adj) to work on a system level, aka "normal" OOM? Is there some peculiarity about memcg OOM that I'm missing?
-- Aleksa Sarai Software Engineer (Containers) SUSE Linux GmbH https://www.cyphar.com/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |