Messages in this thread | | | From | Masahiro Yamada <> | Date | Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:23:17 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] reset: uniphier: add analog amplifiers reset control |
| |
Hi.
2017-08-10 20:11 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>: > 2017-08-10 19:37 GMT+09:00 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>: >> Hi Katsuhiro, >> >> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 16:27 +0900, Katsuhiro Suzuki wrote: >>> Add a reset line for analog signal amplifier core (ADAMV) on >>> UniPhier LD11/LD20 SoCs. >>> >>> > Signed-off-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c >>> index f60c137c17cb..cda4a78a58e2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c >>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c >>> @@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_pro4_peri_reset_data[] = { >>> > UNIPHIER_RESET_END, >>> }; >>> >>> +/* Analog signal amplifiers reset data */ >>> +static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_ld11_adamv_reset_data[] = { >>> > + UNIPHIER_RESETX(100, 0x10, 6), /* EVEA */ >>> > + UNIPHIER_RESET_END, >>> +};
I take back my Acked-by.
The reset line index is independent from others because this block is a separate instance.
Are you OK with starting from the reset ID 100?
-- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
| |