Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:27:03 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure |
| |
> I'm surprised they didn't allow for slave clock stretching when > communicating with a legacy i2c device, it will prohibit use of a rather > large class of devices. :(
Yes, but I3C is push/pull IIRC.
> As for interrupts you are always free to wire up an out-of-band > interrupt like before. :)
Yes, my wording was a bit too strong. It is possible, sure. Yet, I understood that one of the features of I3C is to have in-band interrupt support. We will see if the demand for backward compatibility or "saving pins" is higher.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
| |