Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:15:49 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread be SCHED_DEADLINE |
| |
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:07:09 -0700 Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> wrote:
> > It is rather long. Although I actually hate the SUGOV, it is easily > > grepable. Just comment what it stands for. We can always change it > > later. > > I was thinking why not just SCHED_FLAG_CPUFREQ. That says its for > cpufreq purposes, and is a bit self-documenting. "WORKER" is a bit > redundant and can be dropped in my opinion.
I was thinking that too, but was wondering how tightly coupled is this with SCHED_DEADLINE? I like the searchability of SUGOV, where as CPUFREQ is still quite broad.
-- Steve
| |