Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:37:18 +0300 | From | Yury Norov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64 |
| |
Hi Catalin,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:12:22PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Yury, > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:26:24PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
[...]
> > This is the 4.12 and linux-next - based kernel patches: > > https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/ilp32-4.12 > > https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/ilp32-20170724 > > Thanks. I'll publish the 4.12-based branch sometime next week. > > At this stage I don't see much value in a linux-next based ILP32. I > would rather like to see a 4.13-rc3 based one, in preparation for a 4.13 > branch once released. > > > Should I resend kernel patches to LKML, or links above are enough for > > you? > > The 4.12 link is ok. However, could you please post a 4.13-rcX based > series, maybe split in two so that a few generic patches can be merged > in 4.14?
This is the 4.13-rc3 - based branch: https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/ilp32-4.13-rc3
Patches prior to 52315bc30f4967 ("arm64: ilp32: add documentation on the ILP32 ABI for ARM64") are looking like generic.
Note that this series includes the patch "ptrace: Add compat PTRACE_{G,S}ETSIGMASK handlers": https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9817343/
It is still under discussion in maillist. If it will be rejected, we'd rework arm64 ptrace accordingly.
> Given the reworking of the sigcontext code in 4.13, it would be > good to review the ILP32 changes in this area again.
Thanks, I forgot to mention it in previous email. Changes are mostly located in patches d87e8ed73d59 ("arm64: signal: share lp64 signal structures and routines to ilp32") and 99c30e5df3f4 ("arm64: ilp32: introduce ilp32-specific handlers for sigframe and ucontext"). All reviews are appreciated.
Yury
| |