lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC v5 2/9] sched/deadline: improve the tracking of active utilization
    On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:54:54AM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
    > Hi Peter,
    >
    > I put this change in a local tree together with other fixes / cleanups
    > I plan to submit in the next weeks. Should I send it together with the
    > other patches, or are you going to apply it separately?

    Posting them in a series is fine; it is customary to put independent
    things first such that they will not get stuck after the larger changes.

    > In the first case, what is the correct authorship / SOB chain (I ask
    > because I keep getting this wrong every time :)

    Yes, this is a 'fun' case :-) I'd just merge the change into your patch
    introducing it and forget I 'contributed' the name change.

    For larger patches you could do something like (in your email body):


    From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

    Changelog goes here...

    Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
    Signed-off-by: Luca...
    ---

    $PATCH


    Which says this patch is from me, carried by you, and then I'll stick
    another SoB on to indicated I took it back. Its a bit weird, but we've
    done it before.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-07-24 11:12    [W:7.923 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site