lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use dmi_system_id table for retrieving frequency
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-05-22 19:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>> On 2017-05-22 19:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-05-22 19:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:

>>>> And since there is no difference to the frequency the name is enough.
>>>> So, I wouldn't go with this series as is. See above.
>>>
>>> Nope: Just like for the stmmac, we need to include the asset tags to
>>> avoid matching variations of the devices which may carry the same board
>>> name. While I will try to avoid that this happens, we are better safe
>>> than sorry here.
>>
>> Do we have an issue right now?
>> Yes / No
>
> Andy, we are trying to design a robust upstream driver here, no ad-hoc
> BSP that will not survive the hardware anyway.

You didn't answer my question...

I do not see a good point to solve the issue that might happen in the future.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-22 19:37    [W:0.926 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site