| Subject | Re: RISC-V Linux Port v1 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Date | Mon, 22 May 2017 18:25:41 -0700 |
| |
On 05/22/17 18:16, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi Palmer, > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote: > >> In addition to the threaded messages, our port can be found on Git Hib >> >> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-linux/tree/riscv-for-submission-v1 >> >> [PATCH 1/7] RISC-V: Top-Level Makefile for riscv{32,64} >> [PATCH 2/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv Makefile and Kconfigs >> [PATCH 3/7] RISC-V: Device Tree Documentation >> [PATCH 4/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/include >> [PATCH 5/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/lib >> [PATCH 6/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/kernel >> [PATCH 7/7] RISC-V: arch/riscv/mm > > So, one overall comment on this patchset is that it's not bisectable > (i.e. early patches add Makefile contents that refers to directories > not yet introduced). > > While it's not overly important to really split up a new architecture > introduction into small incremental patches, we generally strive to > have the tree fully buildable at any given commit. Some minor > rearranging would alleviate these problems.
Neither the email patches nor the git tree have any Signed-off-by: entries AFAICT.
-- ~Randy
|