[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] mm: make movable onlining suck less
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:55:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>Anyting? I would really appreciate a feedback from IBM and Futjitsu
>guys who have shaped this code last few years. Also Igor and Vitaly
>seem to be using memory hotplug in virtualized environments. I do not
>expect they would see a huge advantage of the rework but I would
>appreciate to give it some testing to catch any potential regressions.

Sorry for the delayed reply.

With this set, I'm able to "online_movable" blocks in ascending order.

However, I am seeing a regression. When adding memory to a memoryless
node, it shows up in node 0 instead. I'm digging to see if I can help
narrow down where things go wrong.

Reza Arbab

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-03 21:58    [W:1.084 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site