lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: add --typedefsfile
From
Date
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 17:41 +0200, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 08:31 AM, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> > On 04/20/2017 06:49 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 17:39 +0200, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> > > > When using checkpatch on out-of-tree code, it may occur that some
> > > > project-specific types are used, which will cause spurious warnings.
> > > > Add the --typedefsfile option as a way to extend the known types and
> > > > deal with this issue.
> > >
> > > I'm not opposed to the addition.
> > > What out-of-tree project is this for?
> >
> > OP-TEE [1]. We run a Travis job on all pull requests [2], and checkpatch
> > is part of that. The typical false warning we get on a regular basis is
> > with some pointers to functions returning TEE_Result [3], which is a
> > typedef from the GlobalPlatform APIs. We consider it is acceptable to
> > use GP types in the OP-TEE core implementation, that's why this patch
> > would be helpful for us.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os
> > [2] https://travis-ci.org/OP-TEE/optee_os/builds
> > [3] https://travis-ci.org/OP-TEE/optee_os/builds/193355335#L1733
>
> Ping?

It's a well written patch.

But I'll leave it up to Andrew Morton to accept/reject this.

I'm not opposed to it though as it seems reasonable because
using a checkpatch command-line --ignore=NEW_TYPEDEFS may
not be the right solution for your use case.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-04-27 18:01    [W:0.048 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site