[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Arrays of variable length
    On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Måns Rullgård <> wrote:
    > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <> writes:
    >> On Sun, 05 Mar 2017, Måns Rullgård wrote:
    >>> Tomas Winkler <> writes:
    >>> > Sparse complains for arrays declared with variable length
    >>> >
    >>> > 'warning: Variable length array is used'
    >>> >
    >>> > Prior to c99 this was not allowed but lgcc (c99) doesn't have problem
    >>> > with that
    >>> > And also Linux kernel compilation with W=1 doesn't complain.
    >>> >
    >>> > Since sparse is used extensively would like to ask what is the correct
    >>> > usage of arrays of variable length
    >>> > within Linux Kernel.
    >>> Variable-length arrays are a very bad idea. Don't use them, ever.
    >>> If the size has a sane upper bound, just use that value statically.
    >>> Otherwise, you have a stack overflow waiting to happen and should be
    >>> using some kind of dynamic allocation instead.
    >>> Furthermore, use of VLAs generally results in less efficient code. For
    >>> instance, it forces gcc to waste a register for the frame pointer, and
    >>> it often prevents inlining.
    >> Well, if we're going to forbid VLAs in the kernel, IMHO the kernel build
    >> system should call gcc with -Werror=vla to get that point across early,
    >> and flush out any offenders.
    > If it were up to me, that's exactly what I'd do.

    Some parts of the kernel depends on VLA such as ___ON_STACK macros in
    It's actually pretty neat implementation, maybe it's too harsh to
    disable VLA completely.


     \ /
      Last update: 2017-03-09 09:02    [W:2.723 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site