[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:54:48AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Argh!
> >
> > Andrew, please drop that patch. And the x86 out-of-line of __atomic_add_unless().
> Why dropping the second? Do you have something better?

The try_cmpxchg() patches save about half the text, and do not have the
out-of-line penalty as shown here:

> On the first there were no 0day regressions, so at least basic performance
> checking has been done.

The first is superseded by much better patches in the scheduler tree.

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-31 16:46    [W:0.082 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site