lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
From
Date
On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 15:25 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should
> > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to
> > parsing
> > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>
> Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is
> correct?

While Mika agrees on the change, I would like nevertheless to hear Hans'
opinion or even Tested-by tag since it was his fix around those lines.

--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-28 17:06    [W:0.360 / U:0.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site