Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Date | Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:03:00 +0300 |
| |
On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 15:25 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should > > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to > > parsing > > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> > > Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is > correct?
While Mika agrees on the change, I would like nevertheless to hear Hans' opinion or even Tested-by tag since it was his fix around those lines.
-- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
| |