lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm/tpm_crb: fix unused warnings on suspend/resume functions
Date


>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:05:36PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:51:33PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > > > When PM_SLEEP is disabled crb_pm_suspend and crb_pm_resume are
> not
> > > > used by SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS even if PM is enabled:
> > > >
> > > > drvers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c:540:12: warning: ‘crb_pm_suspend’
> > > > defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int
> > > > crb_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > > ^
> > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c:551:12: warning: ‘crb_pm_resume’
> > > > defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int
> > > > crb_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > ^
> > > >
> > > > The preprocessor condition should be on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, not on
> > > CONFIG_PM.
> > > > However, this patch fixes this warning by using __maybe_unused on
> > > > function that are in the preprocessor condition.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
> > >
> > > Thanks. Please include also linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org in the future.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Saskkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > We should go with Arnd's patch, which is actually the same, but it
> > was already reviewed and has better commit messages.
> > Thanks
> > Tomas
>
> You are right about the commit message but where are the Reviewed-by tags?

Please add mine.

> [1]
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9633537/
>
Tomas

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-28 08:17    [W:0.602 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site