Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Juri Lelli <> | Subject | [RFD PATCH 2/5] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection triggering points | Date | Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:08:57 +0000 |
| |
Since SCHED_DEADLINE doesn't track utilization signal (but reserves a fraction of CPU bandwidth to tasks admitted to the system), there is no point in evaluating frequency changes during each tick event.
Move frequency selection triggering points to where running_bw changes.
Co-authored-by: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> --- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 55471016d73c..5c1a205e830f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ void add_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq) dl_rq->running_bw += dl_bw; SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw < old); /* overflow */ SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw); + /* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */ + cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL); } static inline @@ -64,6 +66,8 @@ void sub_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq) SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > old); /* underflow */ if (dl_rq->running_bw > old) dl_rq->running_bw = 0; + /* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */ + cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL); } static inline @@ -953,9 +957,6 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq) return; } - /* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */ - cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL); - schedstat_set(curr->se.statistics.exec_max, max(curr->se.statistics.exec_max, delta_exec)); -- 2.10.0
| |