Messages in this thread | | | From | Masahiro Yamada <> | Date | Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:52:19 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition |
| |
2017-03-20 21:13 GMT+09:00 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>: >> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a): >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: >> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which >> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The >> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide >> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools. >> >>> >> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >> >>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> >> >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> >> >>> --- >> >>> arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++--- >> >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it, >> > >> > Great, please merge it. >> > >> >> but I don't see >> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere. >> > >> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree. >> > >> >> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec. >> >> >> So, how shall we handle this series? >> >> >> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree, >> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case. >> >> >> >> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series >> to linux-kbuild. > > Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > > So please take this via linux-kbuild. > > Will
Applied to linux-kbuild/misc. Thanks!
-- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
| |