lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/6] irqdomain: Add irq_domain_{push,pop}_irq() functions.
From
Date
Hi David,

On 01/03/17 01:48, David Daney wrote:
> For an already existing irqdomain hierarchy, as might be obtained via
> a call to pci_enable_msix(), a PCI driver wishing to add an additional
> irqdomain to the hierarchy needs to be able to insert the irqdomain to
> that already initialized hierarchy. Calling
> irq_domain_create_hierarchy() allows the new irqdomain to be created,
> but no existing code allows for initializing the associated irq_data.

I must say that I like this idea a lot. Pretty elegant. Now, there is a
couple of things that do worry me. And instead of worrying, maybe I
should just ask the questions.

> Add a couple of helper functions (irq_domain_push_irq()
> irq_domain_pop_irq()) to initialize the irq_data for the new
> irqdomain.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 3 +
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 188eced..a7a16b7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -425,6 +425,9 @@ extern void irq_domain_free_irqs_common(struct irq_domain *domain,
> extern void irq_domain_free_irqs_top(struct irq_domain *domain,
> unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs);
>
> +extern int irq_domain_push_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq, void *arg);
> +extern int irq_domain_pop_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq);
> +
> extern int irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(struct irq_domain *domain,
> unsigned int irq_base,
> unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg);
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 31805f2..d5d1c01 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -1304,6 +1304,143 @@ int __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, int irq_base,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* The irq_data was moved, fix the revmap to refer to the new location */
> +static void irq_domain_fix_revmap(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + void **slot;
> +
> + if (d->hwirq < d->domain->revmap_size)
> + return; /* Not using radix tree. */
> +
> + /* Fix up the revmap. */
> + mutex_lock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
> + slot = radix_tree_lookup_slot(&d->domain->revmap_tree, d->hwirq);
> + if (slot)
> + radix_tree_replace_slot(&d->domain->revmap_tree, slot, d);
> + mutex_unlock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * irq_domain_push_irq() - Push a domain in to the top of a hierarchy.
> + * @domain: Domain to push.
> + * @virq: Irq to push the domain in to.
> + * @arg: Passed to the irq_domain_ops alloc() function.
> + *
> + * For an already existing irqdomain hierarchy, as might be obtained
> + * via a call to pci_enable_msix(), add an additional domain to the
> + * head of the processing chain.
> + */
> +int irq_domain_push_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct irq_data *child_irq_data;
> + struct irq_data *root_irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
> +
> + if (domain == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!domain->ops->alloc))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!root_irq_data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + child_irq_data = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*child_irq_data), GFP_KERNEL,
> + irq_data_get_node(root_irq_data));
> + if (!child_irq_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> +
> + /* Copy the original irq_data. */
> + *child_irq_data = *root_irq_data;
> +
> + irq_domain_fix_revmap(child_irq_data);
> +
> + /*
> + * Overwrite the root_irq_data, which is embedded in struct
> + * irq_desc, with values for this domain.
> + */
> + root_irq_data->parent_data = child_irq_data;
> + root_irq_data->domain = domain;
> + root_irq_data->mask = 0;
> + root_irq_data->hwirq = 0;
> + root_irq_data->chip = NULL;
> + root_irq_data->chip_data = NULL;

What guarantees do we have that nobody is using this irqdesc at this
point? Is it a "don't do that because it will hurt" kind of thing? I'd
be more confident if we had some locking here, just to make sure that we
don't start processing an interrupt with all these NULL pointers.

Also, maybe moving the whole stuff to a helper in irqdesc.c if that
makes it easier/nicer? Your call.

> + domain->ops->alloc(domain, virq, 1, arg);

Check return value? You may have to revert your previous fixup if it fails.

> +
> + if (root_irq_data->hwirq < domain->revmap_size) {
> + domain->linear_revmap[root_irq_data->hwirq] = virq;
> + } else {
> + mutex_lock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
> + radix_tree_insert(&domain->revmap_tree,
> + root_irq_data->hwirq, root_irq_data);
> + mutex_unlock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_push_irq);
> +
> +/**
> + * irq_domain_pop_irq() - Remove a domain from the top of a hierarchy.
> + * @domain: Domain to remove.
> + * @virq: Irq to remove the domain from.
> + *
> + * Undo the effects of a call to irq_domain_push_irq().
> + */
> +int irq_domain_pop_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, int virq)
> +{
> + struct irq_data *root_irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
> + struct irq_data *child_irq_data;
> + struct irq_data *tmp_irq_data;
> +
> + if (domain == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!root_irq_data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + tmp_irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> +
> + /* We can only "pop" if this domain is at the top of the list */
> + if (WARN_ON(root_irq_data != tmp_irq_data))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(root_irq_data->domain != domain))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + child_irq_data = root_irq_data->parent_data;
> + if (WARN_ON(!child_irq_data))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> +
> + root_irq_data->parent_data = NULL;
> +
> + if (root_irq_data->hwirq >= domain->revmap_size) {
> + mutex_lock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
> + radix_tree_delete(&domain->revmap_tree, root_irq_data->hwirq);
> + mutex_unlock(&revmap_trees_mutex);
> + }
> +
> + if (domain->ops->free)
> + domain->ops->free(domain, virq, 1);
> +
> + /* Restore the original irq_data. */
> + *root_irq_data = *child_irq_data;

Similar concerns about locking here.

> +
> + irq_domain_fix_revmap(root_irq_data);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> +
> + kfree(child_irq_data);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_pop_irq);
> +
> /**
> * irq_domain_free_irqs - Free IRQ number and associated data structures
> * @virq: base IRQ number
>

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-03-14 17:12    [W:0.086 / U:1.972 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site