lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:56:37PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we really need a spinlock for that in the idle loop?

Urgh, that's broken on RT, you cannot schedule the idle loop.

Also, yeah, reading a s32 should not need no locking, but there's a
bunch of pointer chases in between :/

Nasty code that..

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-22 14:12    [W:0.639 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site