lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] perf stat: Add -a as a default target
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:41:28AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:33:27PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:27:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:00:57PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > Boris asked for default -a option in case we monitor
> > > > only uncore events. While implementing that I thought
> > > > it might be actually useful to make it overall default.
>
> > > > # perf stat
> > > > Warning: No target specified, setting system-wide collection (-a).
>
> > > Humm, would be interesting to disable this after a few warnings? Just
> > > one?
>
> > not sure it's good idea to keep the count of that somewhere..
> > how about i make the warning smaller ;-)
>
> > # perf stat
> > Forced system wide target.
> > ...
>
> > > BTW, this is how 'perf trace' works since day one, i.e. no target means
> > > system wide syscall tracing.
>
> > or we could omit the warning completely as probably perf trace does
>
> I think that we should have some note on the Documentation (have you
> added it?) and be done with it.
>
> Another thing possiblity my mind, print that at the end? like:
>
> perf record
> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data - system wide samples ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.738 MB perf.data (7565 samples) ]
>
> ----------
>
> Then people will thing, hey, so now it does systemwide samples when I
> pass no target, I don't have anymore to type _three_ keys! cool! :-)

ok, I'll check on that and send new version for the last 2 patches

thanks,
jirka

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-17 15:47    [W:1.428 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site