Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:28:39 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m |
| |
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > > > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply > > local_bh_disable(), as it doesn't let softirqs run either. > > Where does local_irq_disable() imply this?
If it doesn't explicitly do so, it probably should. How can we have a softirq execute when irqs are disabled?
-- Steve
| |