lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 16/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Propagate property updates to VLPIs
From
Date
Hi Marc,

On 27/10/2017 16:28, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Upon updating a property, we propagate it all the way to the physical
> ITS, and ask for an INV command to be executed there.
>
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 0b7e648e7a0c..2e77c7c83942 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -296,6 +296,9 @@ static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> }
>
> + if (irq->hw)
> + return its_prop_update_vlpi(irq->host_irq, prop, true);
> +
> return 0;
> }
I am confused by the vgic_queue_irq_unlock() on the "hw" path. Why is it
needed in hw mode?

Thanks

Eric

>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-08 21:07    [W:0.439 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site