lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: A test of the philosophical impact of what I have been talking about / Suggestion for changes in GNU Licence.
    From
    Date
    Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
    > Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
    >> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
    >>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
    >>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux
    >>>> distribution:
    >>>>
    >>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
    >>>> An Available Source Operating System.
    >>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
    >>>>
    >>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
    >>>>
    >>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation.
    >>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest
    >>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
    >>>>
    >>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
    >>>>
    >>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct attitude.
    >>>>
    >>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have yet,
    >>>> but how does it sound?
    >>>>
    >>>> Peace,
    >>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
    >>>
    >>> I have made a good logo
    >>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png
    >>>
    >> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: Everyone
    >> is their own newsservice, getting their views on for instance,
    >> youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a finely
    >> granulated internet economy.
    >>
    >> A test channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
    >>
    >> Peace,
    >> Ywe Cærlyn.
    >>
    > With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
    >
    So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics comes
    from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it back, I would
    suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", and "free software"
    to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, and needs to have a
    corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding uneccesary pointer
    variables in GNU code... ). This is also based on on my conclusion on
    philosophy research over 15 years, and that things need to be right. And
    even metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard Stallman on this,
    maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The hacker will now not
    only be free, but make money. ;)

    Peace.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-11-03 07:54    [W:2.881 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site