Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:33:34 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: watchdog: alim1535_wdt: mark expected switch fall-through |
| |
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:25:09PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper > "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> --- > drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c > index 3a17fbd..60f0c2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.c > @@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ static long ali_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > if (ali_settimer(new_timeout)) > return -EINVAL; > ali_keepalive(); > - /* Fall */ > } > + /* fall through */ > case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: > return put_user(timeout, p); > default:
| |