Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:57:38 +0200 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: return a TPM_RC_COMMAND_CODE response if a command isn't implemented |
| |
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:08:46PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > +#define TPM2_RC_LAYER_SHIFT 16 > +#define TPM2_RESMGRTPM_RC_LAYER (11 << TPM2_RC_LAYER_SHIFT)
I got this spec from Philip [1].
Couple of remarks:
* What is the difference between TSS2_RESMGR_RC_LAYER and TSS2_RESMGR_TPM_RC_LAYER? * Should the driver code use TSS2 or TPM2 prefix?
[1] https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TCG-TSS-2.0-Overview-and-Common-Structures-Specification-Version-0.90-Revision-02.pdf
/Jarkko
| |