lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] list_lru: Prefetch neighboring list entries before acquiring lock
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:17:34 -0500 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:

> The list_lru_del() function removes the given item from the LRU list.
> The operation looks simple, but it involves writing into the cachelines
> of the two neighboring list entries in order to get the deletion done.
> That can take a while if the cachelines aren't there yet, thus
> prolonging the lock hold time.
>
> To reduce the lock hold time, the cachelines of the two neighboring
> list entries are now prefetched before acquiring the list_lru_node's
> lock.
>
> Using a multi-threaded test program that created a large number
> of dentries and then killed them, the execution time was reduced
> from 38.5s to 36.6s after applying the patch on a 2-socket 36-core
> 72-thread x86-64 system.

Patch looks good.

Can someone (Dave?) please explain why list_lru_del() supports deletion
of an already list_empty(item)? This seems a rather dangerous thing to
encourage. Use cases I can think of are:

a) item is already reliably deleted, so why the heck was the caller
calling list_lru_del() and

b) item might be concurrently deleted by another thread, in which case
the race loser is likely to hit a use-after-free.

Is there a good use case here?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-29 22:53    [W:0.201 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site