Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] fix the clock setting for SAR ADC | From | Yixun Lan <> | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:11:29 +0800 |
| |
On 11/11/17 08:37, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:36:00 +0100 > Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Yixun, >> >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@amlogic.com> wrote: >>> patch [1/4]: >>> Fix wrong SARADC/SANA clock gate bit in Meson-GXBB/GXL, >>> the published datasheets[4] also has wrong description about this. >>> This patch should be explicitly merged *before* other patches. >>> >>> patch [2-4/4]: >>> Drop the "sana" clock from SAR ADC module, >> I agree with Jerome that patch 2/4 should be applied last. > > Let me know when I should take this. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > >> when I wrote the driver I couldn't get it to work on my GXBB board >> (which unfortunately has died since then) because the clocks were >> disabled (they weren't enabled by the bootloader). people who are >> using an old .dtb would get the same problem again until the clock >> driver is merged >> >>> From the hardware perspective, the SAR ADC module doesn't >>> require "sana" clock to wrok. This should apply to all SoC, >>> including meson6,8, GXBB, GXL.. >> thank you for clarifying this! >> >>> Note: the whole patchset series has been tested at GXL-P212 board, >>> we haven't got any meson6,8 board to test, so I would appreciate >>> if someone (Martin?) could help to confirm it works there. >> I can test this on a Meson8b and a Meson8m2 board on the weekend - >> I'll let you know about the results >> >> >> Regards >> Martin >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-amlogic mailing list > linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic > > . >
Hi Jonathan Cameron & Kevin Hilman:
since the clk part patch has been applied[1], can we proceed with others?
to Jonathan: I think the iio part(patch [2/4]) should be merged via your iio tree? see [2]
to Kevin: could you take the DTS part? see [3], and the patch [4/4] has a rework version, see [4], to separate dt64 vs dt32 device tree.
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-amlogic/2017-November/005472.html
[2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-amlogic/2017-November/005264.html
[3] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-amlogic/2017-November/005265.html
[4] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-amlogic/2017-November/005304.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-amlogic/2017-November/005305.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-amlogic/2017-November/005306.html
Yixun
| |