Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 26 Nov 2017 16:21:09 +0200 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: FW: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails |
| |
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:25:29PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > That was my interpretation as well and what I was arguing about. I'm glad to > know that you also think the same.
It could be that this rationale has been your earlier emails but I just haven't recognized it :-) I think I'm starting to buy this.
I don't have any fixed standing points anything basically. It is just better to be really resistant with anything that is related to user-kernel interaction until you really get it...
/Jarkko
| |