Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:30:19 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: Prototype patch for Linux-kernel memory model |
| |
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:27:46PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:37:49AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 09:15:05AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:19:21AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > > > I could add a paragraph just before the Signed-off-by/Acked-by/etc. > > > > block describing the roles and contributions, convert the people who > > > > were directly involved to Reviewed-by and everyone else to Acked-by > > > > (unless they explicitly provided a Reviewed-by). > > > > > > > > Would that work, or does someone have a better approach? > > > > > > > How about using the shiny new "Co-Developed-by"? > > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151083859723653&w=2 > > This seems to be exactly what we were looking for/we needed. Altought > still undocumented in "mainline", the tag has already found some uses > in the past, and it appears in its commit log. I've just modified com- > mit-log.txt in the "memory-model" repo. to adopt this tag. > > > > > > Besides, as you know, I've been following and learning a lot from this > > model from maybe very beginning, and I have read throught the documents > > and cat files, and even got a chance to verify some RCU-involved code > > with Andrea using this model ;-) So feel free to add: > > > > Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> > > Added. Thanks,
Thank you, Andrea!
I redid the ordering, given that Boqun did not review before we developed, and also removed his now-redundant Acked-by.
Thanx, Paul
| |