Messages in this thread | | | From | Masahiro Yamada <> | Date | Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:11:34 +0900 | Subject | Re: Coccinelle: badzero.cocci failure |
| |
Hi Julia,
2017-11-14 18:07 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>: >> coccicheck failed >> $ cat cocci-debug.txt >> /home/masahiro/bin/spatch -D report --no-show-diff --very-quiet >> --cocci-file scripts/coccinelle/null/badzero.cocci --dir . -I >> ./arch/x86/include -I ./arch/x86/include/generated -I ./include -I >> ./arch/x86/include/uapi -I ./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I >> ./include/uapi -I ./include/generated/uapi --include >> ./include/linux/kconfig.h --jobs 8 --chunksize 1 >> Fatal error: exception >> Yes_prepare_ocamlcocci.LinkFailure("/tmp/ocaml_cocci_18c9f9.cmxs") > > Does your Coccinelle support OCaml? I'm not sure what is the proper way to > check for this, but in my coccinelle/config.log file I have > > FEATURE_OCAML='1'
Yes. I also see this line in my config.log
> spatch --version gives: > > spatch version 1.0.6-00147-g19f9421 compiled with OCaml version 4.02.3 > Flags passed to the configure script: [none] > Python scripting support: yes > Syntax of regular expresssions: Str
My version output looks like follows:
$ spatch --version spatch version 1.0.6-00345-g2ca0bef compiled with OCaml version 4.02.3 Flags passed to the configure script: --prefix=/home/masahiro Python scripting support: yes Syntax of regular expresssions: PCRE
> I'm not sure why it doesn't give feedback on whether OCaml scripting is > supported. I will check on this. >
Thanks!
-- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
| |