lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [kernel-hardening] [RFC V2 2/6] lib: vsprintf: whitelist stack traces
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:42:05AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:06:46AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > Use the %pP functionality to explicitly allow kernel
> > pointers to be logged for stack traces.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++--
> > kernel/printk/printk.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> > index 5ea4b85..fe09660 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
> > struct stackframe frame;
> > int skip;
> >
> > - pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
> > + pr_debug("%s(regs = %pP tsk = %pP)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
>
> Why do we care for pr_debug?

Because you really want the real value? Seems to make sense to me...

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-04 10:57    [W:0.085 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site