Messages in this thread | | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Date | Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:02:29 +0200 | Subject | Re: regression in 4.14-rc2 caused by apparmor: add base infastructure for socket mediation |
| |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:54 PM, James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> I'm *very* unhappy with the security layer as is > > What are you unhappy with?
We had two big _fundamental_ problems this merge window:
- untested code that clearly didn't do what it claimed it did, and which caused me to not even accept the main pull request
- apparmor code that had a regression, where it took three weeks for that regression to be escalated to me simply because the developer was denying the regression.
Tell me why I *shouldn't* be unhappy with the security layer?
I shouldn't be in the situation where I start reviewing the code and go "that can't be right".
And I *definitely* shouldn't be in the situation where I need to come in three weeks later and tell people what a regression is!
Linus
| |