Messages in this thread | | | From | "Reshetova, Elena" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 0/3] s390 refcount conversions | Date | Tue, 24 Oct 2017 06:58:09 +0000 |
| |
> On 10/20/2017 09:47 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > This series, for S390, replaces atomic_t reference > > counters with the new refcount_t type and API (see include/linux/refcount.h). > > By doing this we prevent intentional or accidental > > underflows or overflows that can led to use-after-free vulnerabilities. > > > > The patches are fully independent and can be cherry-picked separately. > > Patches are based on top of linux-next as of yesterday. > > If there are no objections to the patches, please merge them via respective trees > > > > Elena Reshetova (3): > > [S390] vmur: convert urdev.ref_count from atomic_t to refcount_t > > [S390] net: convert lcs_reply.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t > > [S390] qeth: convert qeth_reply.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t > > > > drivers/s390/char/vmur.c | 8 ++++---- > > drivers/s390/char/vmur.h | 4 +++- > > drivers/s390/net/lcs.c | 10 +++++----- > > drivers/s390/net/lcs.h | 3 ++- > > drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h | 3 ++- > > drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 10 +++++----- > > 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > Thanks Elena, I picked up the two network patches. Also removed the WARN_ONs > while applying, > those who care may use CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL.
Thank you Julian! I had them first removed also, but since we got x86 that doesn't WARN in these cases, I put them back just to make sure I don't make any unexpected changes.
Do you know who would be the correct person to take the last patch?
Best Regards, Elena
| |