lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table
Hi Wolfram,

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "atmel,spd",
>> + .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
>> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
>> + },
>
> checkpatch reported this one as un-documented. And come to think of it,
> since this is solely for EEPROMs on RAM modules, I think we can drop a
> DT binding for it. Could you agree? I can do it locally, no need to
> resend. I'll do HW testing later, but wanted to check on your opinion
> already.

Why?

No one has placeholders for memory modules in DT?
In addition, I can imagine a DT overlay for a memory module, adding the
memory node and the EEPROM.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-22 17:09    [W:0.101 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site