lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: Introduce NVIDIA Tegra20 video decoder driver
From
Date
On 18.10.2017 00:13, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:13:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt
>> [...]
>>>> +- resets : Must contain an entry for each entry in reset-names.
>>>> + See ../reset/reset.txt for details.
>>>> +- reset-names : Must include the following entries:
>>>> + - vde
>>>
>>> -names is pointless when there is only one.
>>
>> I'd prefer to keep it. In the past we occasionally had to add clocks or
>> resets to a device tree node where only one had been present (and hence
>> no -names property) and that caused some awkwardness because verbiage
>> had to be added to the bindings that clarified that one particular entry
>> (the original one) always had to come first.
>
> The order should be specified regardless of -names and the original
> one has to come first if you add any. That's not awkwardness, but how
> bindings work.

Probably it would be okay to remove '-names' from the binding doc, but keep them
in the actual DT, wouldn't it?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-17 23:28    [W:0.453 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site