Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH][next] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: make a couple of local functions static | From | Hans de Goede <> | Date | Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:52:04 +0200 |
| |
Hi,
On 12-10-17 22:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > +Cc: Hans > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote: >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >> >> The functions cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047 and cht_int33fe_find_max17047 >> are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make >> them static. >> >> Cleans up sparse warnings: >> symbol 'cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047' was not declared. Should it be >> static? >> symbol 'cht_int33fe_find_max17047' was not declared. Should it be static? >> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Patch looks good to me, thank you for catching this:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Regards,
Hans
>> --- >> drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c >> index 94716b2fbc00..286c6207765d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct cht_int33fe_data { >> * These helpers are used to work around this by checking if an i2c-client >> * for the max17047 has already been registered. >> */ >> -int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data) >> +static int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data) >> { >> struct i2c_client **max17047 = data; >> struct acpi_device *adev; >> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data) >> return 1; >> } >> >> -struct i2c_client *cht_int33fe_find_max17047(void) >> +static struct i2c_client *cht_int33fe_find_max17047(void) >> { >> struct i2c_client *max17047 = NULL; >> >> -- >> 2.14.1 >> > > >
| |