Messages in this thread | | | From | Kevin Hilman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add Platform MHU mailbox driver for Amlogic GXBB | Date | Tue, 06 Sep 2016 10:56:18 -0700 |
| |
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Jassi, >>>> >>>> Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> In order to support Mailbox links for the Amlogic GXBB SoC, add a generic >>>>> platform MHU driver based on arm_mhu.c. >>>>> >>>>> This patchset follows a RFC thread along the GXBB SCPI support at : >>>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466503374-28841-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com >>>>> And specific MHU discussions at : >>>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CABb+yY3HqJG2+GMWCWF9PomxobrwWGZ=TZe5NvXPcHMDdLhkcQ@mail.gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> Changes since v1 at http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470732737-18391-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com : >>>>> - Fix irq to signed to detect platform_get_irq() failures >>>>> - Introduced back the secure channel >>>>> - Fixed indexes >>>> >>>> How is this version looking to you? >>>> >>>> With your review/ack on the driver, I'd be happy to take it via the >>>> amlogic tree as there shouldn't be any conflicts with your tree. >>>> >>> I am ok with the driver, but I don't understand how it helps going via >>> amlogic tree. I would like to send a pull request every release ;) >> >> That's fine with me too. I offered tot take int just in case you had >> already sent pull requests for this cycle, and also since I'll take >> the DT changes through arm-soc. >> > This revision came after rc2, so it wasn't included. I will queue > patch-1 & 2 for next release, and you the patch-3.
OK, sounds good. Thanks,
Kevin
| |