lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [v2 patch v3.18+ regression fix] sched: Further improve spurious CPU_IDLE active migrations
From
Date
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 15:07 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 15:01 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Le Monday 05 Sep 2016 à 18:26:53 (+0200), Mike Galbraith a écrit :
> > > Coming back to this, how about this instead, only increase the
> > > group
> > > imbalance threshold when sd_llc_size == 2. Newer L3 equipped
> > > processors then aren't affected.
> > >
> >
> > Not sure that all systems with sd_llc_size == 2 wants this
> > behavior.
> >
> > Why not adding a sched_feature for changing the 2nd half of the
> > test
> > for some systems ?
>
> Because users won't know, and shouldn't need to know that they need to
> flip that switch.

The patchlet just puts these CPUs back in the same boat they were in
before Rik's patch landed. Also, if people are doing serious compute,
they're unlikely to leave any placement decisions up to the scheduler.

-Mike

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:0.084 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site